你的GRE阅读一直无法提高就是因为...

作者:闫晨晨 发布时间:2024-12-23

最近准备申请2025 Fall和2026 Fall的同学都已经开始陆续加入GRE备考的大军中啦。大家起初在GRE备考中容易受到的最大的两个冲击就是:

1.GRE填空的单词是真的虐

2.GRE阅读选对选错完全凭缘分

单词虐似乎一开始就有心里预期。但是阅读部分,词汇没填空那么变态,竟然做题还那么玄学!在文中明明能找到出处的选项不见得对,文章明明没提过的选项反倒成了正确选项?!
这其实就是GRE阅读考“逻辑分析能力”的一个表现,非常有别于之前我们比较熟悉的托福雅思这些语言类考试的阅读。很多同学会带着之前解语言类考试的思路来做GRE阅读,只关注选项和文章的字面意思,在GRE阅读题中就会迎来巨大的挫败感…
阅读中会出现的逻辑以及对应我们应该进行的逻辑分析是有一个系统且庞大的体系的。今天就来讲其中最好理解的一种——“比较逻辑”来入门,帮助同学们建立起要分析文章逻辑的这种阅读意识!
今天主要给大家讲2点和“比较”相关的重要注意事项!

NO1.利用文章的比较逻辑进行合理的信息推断

最常见的就是当文章存在两个对象的对比时,可以进行反推。

比如:文章将A和B进行对比,只告诉我们A的特点。题目问B的特点是什么。

此时我们可以大胆的选择A特点的对立面。

让我们一起来看一道GRE真题试一下~

W.E.B. Du Bois’ exhibit of African American history and culture at the 1900 Paris Exposition Universelle attracted the attention of a world of sociological scholarship whose value his work challenged. Du Bois believed that Spencerian sociologists failed in their attempts to gain greater understanding of human deeds because their work examined not deeds but theories and because they gathered data not to affect social progress but merely to theorize. In his exhibit, Du Bois sought to present cultural artifacts that would shift the focus of sociology from the construction of vast generalizations to the observation of particular, living individual elements of society and the working contributions of individual people to a vast functioning social structure.

For the following question, consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
The passage implies that Du Bois believed which of the following statements about sociology?
A. It should contribute to the betterment of society.
B. It should study what people actually do.
C. It should focus on how existing social structures determine individual behavior.

思路分析

这是一道不定项选择的信息题。问关于Du Bois以下哪个说法是正确的。

 

这篇文章是将Du Bois与Spencerian sociologists进行了对比。

 

根据文章,我们可以得知:

1.Du Bois 想focus在“observation of particular, living individual elements of society and the working contributions of individual people to a vast functioning social structure”上。所以有与之相对应的选项可以选。这是直接信息。

 

2.Spencerian sociologists是failed in their attempts to gain greater understanding of human deeds /examined not deeds but theories /not to affect social progress but merely to theorize.

由于Du Bois和Spencerian sociologists是对比关系,所以Spencerian sociologists的反面在这个题中也可以选。这就是我们刚刚说的利用“对比”逻辑进行反推。

观察选项:

A选项,contribute to the betterment of society。这个就是Spencerian sociologists的反面(因为Spencerian sociologists是not to affect social progress,progress即betterment)。通过反推原则,可以选。

 

B选项,study what people actually do。这个也是Spencerian sociologists的反面(因为Spencerian sociologists是failed in understanding of human deeds)。也是通过反推原则,可以选。

 

C选项, social structures determine individual behavior,文章没有谈论过是什么在决定individual behavior,无关选项。

 

因此,正确答案是AB。

NO2.文章不存在比较关系时不要随便选择有比较逻辑的选项

这个原则很容易理解,说白了就是文章如果没有比较、那选项也不能随便瞎比较。

误区

但是!有无数同学经常会选到一些 “无关比较”的选项上。究其原因是大家在看选项的时候根本不注意选项表达出的逻辑形式,只是觉得选项用的这些词或者说是概念文章里都出现过,觉得眼熟就选了…

这点也让我们一起来看一道GRE真题试一下~

There is mounting evidence that the frequency and magnitude of landsliding is changing in many parts of the world in response to climate change. This is not surprising, given that precipitation is one of the two external triggering mechanisms—the other being seismic activity—involved in the formation of landslides. Evidence from the past clearly indicates that cycles of elevated landslide activity have been followed by cycles of low activity, and that these are correlated with climate fluctuations over a variety of timescales.

 

What sets current changes in landslide activity apart is the likely influence of anthropogenic (i.e., human-caused) factors, either acting alone or in concert with climate, which can further modify the process of landsliding and the nature of ecosystem responses. Among these factors, deforestation and land-use change have the potential to influence the frequency and magnitude of landsliding because of their direct effects on vegetation attributes that influence slope stability. The extent and conditions under which mountain ecosystems are resilient to these changes—that is, the amount of disturbance they can absorb before changing into states with different structure and function—are not known. Addressing this issue is crucial for the long-term conservation of mountainscapes.

For the following question, consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the role of human factors in landsliding activity?
A. Human factors can intensify or alter the effects of climate change on landsliding activity.
B. It is likely that human factors affect landsliding activity more than climate change does.
C. Until recently, human factors did not have much impact on landsliding activity.

思路分析

文章主线是:
第一段:landslides受气候影响。
第二段:最近的landslides还受人为因素的影响;我们不确定山体本身对这些因素的弹性,需要处理这个问题。
这道题目就是问人类起到的作用。这是第二段的主线信息。
A选项,没问题,对应第二段第一句的信息:人类的因素可以和气候的因素协同作用,进一步影响landsliding process。

B选项,是非常非常多同学会误选的选项!因为在这个选项里既看到了human又看到了climate,觉得都是文章主要讲过的东西。但是!文章只是说气候和人类都影响,并没有比较谁的影响更大。典型的“强加比较”的选项!

C选项,也是很多同学容易出错的一个选项,错因就是对于“until”的理解。很多同学误以为C表达的是:最近,人类对于landsliding没影响。因此误以为这个选项跟原文相反就没选。
但其实until是before,所以这个选项真正表达的是:“之前”的时候,人类对landsliding activity的影响不大。
 
关于until的精准理解大家也可以再详细看一下前几天的这篇推送:
"until"到底是什么意思?你以为你认识的until是无数同学踩过的坑…
 
那这个选项就很正确,第二段说了人类是近期才产生的影响(sets current changes in landslide activity apart),所以可以推出“之前”人类影响不大。
最终这个题应该双选AC。

总结

对于GRE阅读中的比较逻辑,我们需要注意:

1.利用文章的比较逻辑进行合理的信息推断

 

2.文章不存在比较关系时不要随便选择有比较逻辑的选项

当然,今天讲的比较逻辑只是整个GRE阅读逻辑体系里的冰山一角,更重要的是通过这个简单的例子可以激发起大家做GRE阅读时分析逻辑的意识。
想要系统学习GRE阅读逻辑分析及解题方法的同学也可以关注青山学堂GRE王牌全程班
推荐阅读
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3